Empirical Research on Sovereign Debt and Default, Working Paper 2012-06


Journal article


Mark L. J. Wright, Michael Tomz
2012

Semantic Scholar
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Wright, M. L. J., & Tomz, M. (2012). Empirical Research on Sovereign Debt and Default, Working Paper 2012-06.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Wright, Mark L. J., and Michael Tomz. “Empirical Research on Sovereign Debt and Default, Working Paper 2012-06” (2012).


MLA   Click to copy
Wright, Mark L. J., and Michael Tomz. Empirical Research on Sovereign Debt and Default, Working Paper 2012-06. 2012.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{mark2012a,
  title = {Empirical Research on Sovereign Debt and Default, Working Paper 2012-06},
  year = {2012},
  author = {Wright, Mark L. J. and Tomz, Michael}
}

Abstract

The long history of sovereign debt and the associated enforcement problem have attracted researchers in many fields. In this paper, we survey empirical work by economists, historians, and political scientists. As we review the empirical literature, we emphasize parallel developments in the theory of sovereign debt. One major theme emerges. Although recent research has sought to balance theoretical and empirical considerations, there remains a gap between theories of sovereign debt and the data used to test them. We recommend a number of steps that researchers can take to improve the correspondence between theory and data. JEL Codes: C82, E01, F21, F34, F51, F55, N20